|
Common
Capital Structures The following capital structures provide our
capital partners and investors with vehicles to generate risk managed
returns. Furthermore, borrowers
often retain the our service groups to assist in engineering
the proper capital structure for a proposed transaction. The following
table represents some of the more common capital structures used in
today's marketplace.
| Equity |
| Traditional equity investment into the ownership entity as
a partner, member or stockholder. Investments are with qualified
developers and operators in transactions where there is a significant
opportunity for value creation or cash flow enhancement. The
equity and preferred return are typically distributed on a pari
passu basis. |
| Preferred Equity |
| Preferred Equity is best suited for situations
where the developer lacks the additional equity capital required
to bridge the gap between debt and purchase or development cost.
A Preferred Equity investment is typically structured so that
the investor receives its investment plus a preferred return
and a participation in profits to achieve their target IRR. |
| Mezzanine Debt |
| Mezzanine Debt provides developers with subordinate debt funding
up to approximately 90% of the value of the property. This program
is attractive to developers who want to retain a greater share
of the profits. The first mortgage is typically straight debt
and the second mortgage is the higher risk and higher yield instrument,
which has either a higher coupon or exit fees. The lender may
be the same for both debt instruments or could be two different
lenders. This structure is particularly good for developers who
want to retain 100% ownership. |
| Participating Debt |
| Participating Debt leverages the property
to 90% of the cost and as much as 80% of the stabilized value
of the property, typically in a blended first and second mortgage
structure. This type of structure has many of the characteristics
as Mezzanine Debt, but typically there is only one lender. |
| Development Agreement |
| The investor actually takes the ownership position and through
a Development Agreement contracts the developer to build and
manage the asset. The developer receives 25% to 30% of the profits.
This is ideally suited for developers who have no cash equity
of their own, young developers with an experienced background
but just starting out on their own and for those developers who
want to minimize risk. |
|
|
 |